Try To Die vs Blood Zone
Blood Zone currently leads with 2,982 concurrent players against 561, a 5.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Blood Zone at 3,148 concurrent players, versus 1,626. Lifetime, Try To Die has more visits (46M vs 27.2M). Full side-by-side history for Try To Die and Blood Zone is charted above.
Try To Die 💀
561
playing now
708 24h peak · 46M visits
VS
Blood Zone 🩸
2,982
playing now
3,148 24h peak · 27.2M visits
Player count history
Try To DieBlood Zone
Head to head
| Metric | Try To Die | Blood Zone | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 561 | 2,982 | 2,421 (5.3×) |
| 24h peak | 708 | 3,148 | 2,440 (4.4×) |
| 24h average | 504 | 2,593 | 2,089 (5.1×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,626 | 3,148 | 1,522 (1.9×) |
| 7-day average | 937 | 1,797 | 860 (1.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,626 | 3,148 | 1,522 (1.9×) |
| All-time peak | 1,626 | 3,148 | 1,522 (1.9×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 8.0% | ▲ 37.0% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 46M | 27.2M | 18.8M (1.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 45.1K | 174.3K | 129.2K (3.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 273.2K | 565.9K | 292.7K (2.1×) |
| Favorites | 2.3M | 104.4K | 2.2M (21.8×) |
| Rating | 82.4% | 79.1% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,799 | #621 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | -122.0 | 149.2 | — |
| Created | Apr 13, 2023 | Jul 4, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Puzzle | Shooter | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Try To Die, 5 for Blood Zone.