Try To Die vs [UPD] Slippery Stairs
Try To Die currently leads with 850 concurrent players against 386, a 2.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Try To Die at 1,626 concurrent players, versus 571. Momentum favours [UPD] Slippery Stairs: +11.2% week over week versus -47.8% for Try To Die. Lifetime, [UPD] Slippery Stairs has more visits (89.8M vs 46.4M). Full side-by-side history for Try To Die and [UPD] Slippery Stairs is charted above.
Try To Die 💀
850
playing now
1,246 24h peak · 46.4M visits
VS
[UPD] Slippery Stairs
386
playing now
571 24h peak · 89.8M visits
Player count history
Try To Die[UPD] Slippery Stairs
Head to head
| Metric | Try To Die | [UPD] Slippery Stairs | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 850 | 386 | 464 (2.2×) |
| 24h peak | 1,246 | 571 | 675 (2.2×) |
| 24h average | 916 | 406 | 510 (2.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,246 | 571 | 675 (2.2×) |
| 7-day average | 492 | 347 | 145 |
| 30-day peak | 1,626 | 571 | 1,055 (2.8×) |
| All-time peak | 1,626 | 571 | 1,055 (2.8×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 175.9% | ▲ 14.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 47.8% | ▲ 11.2% | — |
| Total visits | 46.4M | 89.8M | 43.4M (1.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 73.9K | 131.7K | 57.8K (1.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 302.1K | 809.2K | 507K (2.7×) |
| Favorites | 2.3M | 7.4M | 5.1M (3.2×) |
| Rating | 82.3% | 88.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,534 | #2,384 | of 7,866 |
| Trending score | 243.3 | 41.5 | — |
| Created | Apr 13, 2023 | Jan 3, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Puzzle | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Try To Die, 12 for [UPD] Slippery Stairs.