Try To Die vs [KILLSTREAKS] BLITZ FPS
Try To Die currently leads with 1,205 concurrent players against 858. On all-time peak the record belongs to Try To Die at 1,626 concurrent players, versus 1,149. Momentum favours [KILLSTREAKS] BLITZ FPS: +43.8% week over week versus -46.2% for Try To Die. Lifetime, Try To Die has more visits (46.3M vs 770.5K). Full side-by-side history for Try To Die and [KILLSTREAKS] BLITZ FPS is charted above.
Try To Die 💀
1,205
playing now
1,246 24h peak · 46.3M visits
VS
[KILLSTREAKS] BLITZ FPS
858
playing now
1,149 24h peak · 770.5K visits
Player count history
Try To Die[KILLSTREAKS] BLITZ FPS
Head to head
| Metric | Try To Die | [KILLSTREAKS] BLITZ FPS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,205 | 858 | 347 |
| 24h peak | 1,246 | 1,149 | 97 |
| 24h average | 914 | 722 | 192 |
| 7-day peak | 1,246 | 1,149 | 97 |
| 7-day average | 514 | 404 | 110 |
| 30-day peak | 1,626 | 1,149 | 477 |
| All-time peak | 1,626 | 1,149 | 477 |
| 24h change | ▲ 168.8% | ▲ 81.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 46.2% | ▲ 43.8% | — |
| Total visits | 46.3M | 770.5K | 45.6M (60.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 59.6K | 99.3K | 39.7K (1.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 290.9K | 407.5K | 116.5K |
| Favorites | 2.3M | 32.2K | 2.3M (71.0×) |
| Rating | 82.3% | 93.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,434 | #1,771 | of 7,787 |
| Trending score | 220.1 | 212.3 | — |
| Created | Apr 13, 2023 | Jul 7, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Puzzle | Shooter | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Try To Die, 10 for [KILLSTREAKS] BLITZ FPS.