Try To Die vs CQB Hell
Try To Die currently leads with 1,240 concurrent players against 1,076. On all-time peak the record belongs to Try To Die at 1,626 concurrent players, versus 1,196. Momentum favours CQB Hell: +25.5% week over week versus -47.4% for Try To Die. Lifetime, Try To Die has more visits (46.3M vs 12.1M). Full side-by-side history for Try To Die and CQB Hell is charted above.
Try To Die 💀
1,240
playing now
1,240 24h peak · 46.3M visits
VS
CQB Hell
1,076
playing now
1,148 24h peak · 12.1M visits
Player count history
Try To DieCQB Hell
Head to head
| Metric | Try To Die | CQB Hell | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,240 | 1,076 | 164 |
| 24h peak | 1,240 | 1,148 | 92 |
| 24h average | 876 | 888 | 12 |
| 7-day peak | 1,240 | 1,188 | 52 |
| 7-day average | 504 | 724 | 220 |
| 30-day peak | 1,626 | 1,188 | 438 |
| All-time peak | 1,626 | 1,196 | 430 |
| 24h change | ▲ 155.4% | ▲ 8.0% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 47.4% | ▲ 25.5% | — |
| Total visits | 46.3M | 12.1M | 34.3M (3.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 56.8K | 100.4K | 43.5K (1.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 289.5K | 653.7K | 364.2K (2.3×) |
| Favorites | 2.3M | 54.6K | 2.2M (41.9×) |
| Rating | 82.3% | 71.6% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,448 | #1,593 | of 7,783 |
| Trending score | 207.3 | 64.7 | — |
| Created | Apr 13, 2023 | Mar 14, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Puzzle | Shooter | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Try To Die, 8 for CQB Hell.