Animal Sim: Underwater vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Animal Sim: Underwater currently leads with 944 concurrent players against 942. On all-time peak the record belongs to FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB at 1,769 concurrent players, versus 1,579. Momentum favours Animal Sim: Underwater: +6.2% week over week versus -15.8% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, Animal Sim: Underwater has more visits (265.8M vs 7.4M). Full side-by-side history for Animal Sim: Underwater and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

Animal Sim: Underwater
944
playing now
1,405 24h peak · 265.8M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
942
playing now
1,769 24h peak · 7.4M visits

Player count history

Animal Sim: UnderwaterFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric Animal Sim: Underwater FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now9449422
24h peak1,4051,769364
24h average1,0761,241165
7-day peak1,5791,769190
7-day average9831,06885
30-day peak1,5791,769190
All-time peak1,5791,769190
24h change 7.3% 4.2%
7d change 6.2% 15.8%
Total visits265.8M7.4M258.4M (35.9×)
Visits (24h)127.5K198.4K70.9K (1.6×)
Visits (7d)836.8K1.1M299.3K
Favorites226K803K577K (3.6×)
Rating84.8%81.7%
Global rank (players)#1,391#1,378of 8,283
Trending score28.049.0
CreatedApr 13, 2023Apr 24, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Animal Sim: Underwater, 10 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.