Animal Sim: Underwater vs World at War

World at War currently leads with 1,163 concurrent players against 1,126. On all-time peak the record belongs to World at War at 1,745 concurrent players, versus 1,579. Momentum favours Animal Sim: Underwater: +8.2% week over week versus +5.1% for World at War. Lifetime, Animal Sim: Underwater has more visits (265.8M vs 6.3M). Full side-by-side history for Animal Sim: Underwater and World at War is charted above.

Animal Sim: Underwater
1,126
playing now
1,405 24h peak · 265.8M visits
VS
World at War
1,163
playing now
1,323 24h peak · 6.3M visits

Player count history

Animal Sim: UnderwaterWorld at War

Head to head

Metric Animal Sim: Underwater World at WarDifference
Playing now1,1261,16337
24h peak1,4051,32382
24h average1,1531,09360
7-day peak1,5791,5834
7-day average1,0011,07978
30-day peak1,5791,5834
All-time peak1,5791,745166
24h change 0.2% 0.3%
7d change 8.2% 5.1%
Total visits265.8M6.3M259.5M (42.3×)
Visits (24h)129.1K161.8K32.7K
Visits (7d)838.1K1.3M442.9K (1.5×)
Favorites226K6.7K219.3K (33.7×)
Rating84.8%81.1%
Global rank (players)#1,346#1,320of 8,283
Trending score45.43.9
CreatedApr 13, 2023May 30, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimStrategy

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Animal Sim: Underwater, 12 for World at War.