[5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower vs [STUN] Classic Tower Defense
[5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower currently leads with 140 concurrent players against 83, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower at 1,006 concurrent players, versus 477. Momentum favours [STUN] Classic Tower Defense: +126.9% week over week versus -40.8% for [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower. Lifetime, [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower has more visits (352.6M vs 2.7M). Full side-by-side history for [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower and [STUN] Classic Tower Defense is charted above.
Player count history
Head to head
| Metric | [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower | [STUN] Classic Tower Defense | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 140 | 83 | 57 (1.7×) |
| 24h peak | 554 | 477 | 77 |
| 24h average | 250 | 89 | 161 (2.8×) |
| 7-day peak | 817 | 477 | 340 (1.7×) |
| 7-day average | 385 | 59 | 326 (6.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 817 | 477 | 340 (1.7×) |
| All-time peak | 1,006 | 477 | 529 (2.1×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 12.9% | ▲ 53.4% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 40.8% | ▲ 126.9% | — |
| Total visits | 352.6M | 2.7M | 349.8M (128.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 50.4K | 18.8K | 31.5K (2.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 502.1K | 87K | 415.1K (5.8×) |
| Favorites | 224.9K | 74.1K | 150.8K (3.0×) |
| Rating | 87.1% | 86.6% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #3,127 | #3,579 | of 7,126 |
| Trending score | -79.5 | 71.3 | — |
| Created | Apr 7, 2023 | Feb 5, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 8 days for [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower, 10 for [STUN] Classic Tower Defense.