[5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower vs Track & Field: Infinite

Track & Field: Infinite currently leads with 437 concurrent players against 196, a 2.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower at 1,006 concurrent players, versus 896. Momentum favours Track & Field: Infinite: +22.0% week over week versus -42.7% for [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower. Lifetime, [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower has more visits (352.6M vs 178M). Full side-by-side history for [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower and Track & Field: Infinite is charted above.

[5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower
196
playing now
554 24h peak · 352.6M visits
VS
Track & Field: Infinite
437
playing now
522 24h peak · 178M visits

Player count history

[5800 stage!! ] Effortless TowerTrack & Field: Infinite

Head to head

Metric [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower Track & Field: InfiniteDifference
Playing now196437241 (2.2×)
24h peak55452232
24h average269389120
7-day peak81785740
7-day average39046676
30-day peak81785740
All-time peak1,006896110
24h change 6.9% 0.5%
7d change 42.7% 22.0%
Total visits352.6M178M174.5M (2.0×)
Visits (24h)50.2K57.5K7.3K
Visits (7d)504K529.3K25.4K
Favorites224.9K254.7K29.8K
Rating87.1%83.6%
Global rank (players)#2,843#2,109of 7,127
Trending score-71.3-40.8
CreatedApr 7, 2023Feb 18, 2024
GenreObby & PlatformerSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 8 days for [5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower, 9 for Track & Field: Infinite.

[5800 stage!! ] Effortless Tower vs Track & Field: Infinite — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals