War Machines vs Eat the World

Eat the World currently leads with 2,684 concurrent players against 1,905. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 5,001. Momentum favours War Machines: +8.6% week over week versus -18.2% for Eat the World. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (618.6M vs 447.2M). Full side-by-side history for War Machines and Eat the World is charted above.

War Machines
1,905
playing now
4,682 24h peak · 447.2M visits
VS
Eat the World
2,684
playing now
3,880 24h peak · 618.6M visits

Player count history

War MachinesEat the World

Head to head

Metric War Machines Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now1,9052,684779
24h peak4,6823,880802
24h average2,9992,96732
7-day peak4,6824,101581
7-day average2,9323,170238
30-day peak4,6824,294388
All-time peak5,0015,261260
24h change 8.7% 9.3%
7d change 8.6% 18.2%
Total visits447.2M618.6M171.4M
Visits (24h)449K296.8K152.2K (1.5×)
Visits (7d)2.8M2.2M536.4K
Favorites665K27.9M27.2M (41.9×)
Rating90.6%94.7%
Global rank (players)#733#530of 8,339
Trending score7.9-22.1
CreatedMar 18, 2023Feb 22, 2024
GenreActionSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for War Machines, 14 for Eat the World.