FNAF: Co-op vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower
FNAF: Co-op currently leads with 1,567 concurrent players against 1,480. On all-time peak the record belongs to Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower at 4,443 concurrent players, versus 3,912. Momentum favours FNAF: Co-op: -9.2% week over week versus -19.1% for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower. Lifetime, FNAF: Co-op has more visits (384.1M vs 21.6M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Co-op and Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower is charted above.
FNAF: Co-op
1,567
playing now
3,381 24h peak · 384.1M visits
VS
Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower 💃
1,480
playing now
2,960 24h peak · 21.6M visits
Player count history
FNAF: Co-opWould You Rather: Emote Testing Tower
Head to head
| Metric | FNAF: Co-op | Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,567 | 1,480 | 87 |
| 24h peak | 3,381 | 2,960 | 421 |
| 24h average | 2,342 | 1,928 | 414 |
| 7-day peak | 3,815 | 3,557 | 258 |
| 7-day average | 2,269 | 2,141 | 128 |
| 30-day peak | 3,815 | 4,443 | 628 |
| All-time peak | 3,912 | 4,443 | 531 |
| 24h change | ▲ 5.8% | ▼ 11.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 9.2% | ▼ 19.1% | — |
| Total visits | 384.1M | 21.6M | 362.4M (17.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 230.8K | 321.7K | 90.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 2.4M | 822.9K (1.5×) |
| Favorites | 4.2M | 1.9M | 2.2M (2.2×) |
| Rating | 94.3% | 84.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #928 | #1,044 | of 8,019 |
| Trending score | 10.7 | -32.3 | — |
| Created | Feb 15, 2023 | Apr 13, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Obby & Platformer | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for FNAF: Co-op, 13 for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower.