FNAF: Co-op vs Eat the World

FNAF: Co-op currently leads with 2,923 concurrent players against 2,788. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 3,912. Momentum favours FNAF: Co-op: -5.6% week over week versus -12.8% for Eat the World. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (618.2M vs 384M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Co-op and Eat the World is charted above.

FNAF: Co-op
2,923
playing now
3,381 24h peak · 384M visits
VS
Eat the World
2,788
playing now
4,011 24h peak · 618.2M visits

Player count history

FNAF: Co-opEat the World

Head to head

Metric FNAF: Co-op Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now2,9232,788135
24h peak3,3814,011630
24h average2,6463,057411
7-day peak3,8154,9531,138
7-day average2,3513,343992
30-day peak3,8154,9531,138
All-time peak3,9125,2611,349
24h change 29.1% 4.7%
7d change 5.6% 12.8%
Total visits384M618.2M234.3M (1.6×)
Visits (24h)226.1K323.1K97K
Visits (7d)1.6M2.4M763.1K
Favorites4.2M27.9M23.7M (6.6×)
Rating94.3%94.7%
Global rank (players)#558#597of 7,866
Trending score42.5-29.6
CreatedFeb 15, 2023Feb 22, 2024
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for FNAF: Co-op, 12 for Eat the World.