FNAF: Co-op vs BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE currently leads with 3,288 concurrent players against 1,352, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE at 4,261 concurrent players, versus 3,912. Momentum favours BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE: -2.9% week over week versus -11.3% for FNAF: Co-op. Lifetime, FNAF: Co-op has more visits (384.1M vs 34.9M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Co-op and BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE is charted above.
FNAF: Co-op
1,352
playing now
3,381 24h peak · 384.1M visits
VS
BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
3,288
playing now
4,261 24h peak · 34.9M visits
Player count history
FNAF: Co-opBUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE
Head to head
| Metric | FNAF: Co-op | BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,352 | 3,288 | 1,936 (2.4×) |
| 24h peak | 3,381 | 4,261 | 880 |
| 24h average | 2,096 | 3,282 | 1,186 (1.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 3,815 | 4,261 | 446 |
| 7-day average | 2,213 | 3,003 | 790 |
| 30-day peak | 3,815 | 4,261 | 446 |
| All-time peak | 3,912 | 4,261 | 349 |
| 24h change | ▼ 5.4% | ▲ 12.7% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 11.3% | ▼ 2.9% | — |
| Total visits | 384.1M | 34.9M | 349.1M (11.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 230.5K | 263.3K | 32.8K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 1.7M | 132.8K |
| Favorites | 4.2M | 49.4K | 4.1M (84.9×) |
| Rating | 94.3% | 81.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,069 | #514 | of 8,017 |
| Trending score | -17.4 | 32.4 | — |
| Created | Feb 15, 2023 | May 10, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for FNAF: Co-op, 12 for BUILD AND HIDE TO SURVIVE.