Fencing vs [REBALANCE] Fast Lifting Simulator

[REBALANCE] Fast Lifting Simulator currently leads with 478 concurrent players against 3, a 159.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [REBALANCE] Fast Lifting Simulator at 700 concurrent players, versus 490. Momentum favours Fencing: +1900.0% week over week versus -11.4% for [REBALANCE] Fast Lifting Simulator. Lifetime, Fencing has more visits (33.6M vs 2.1M). Full side-by-side history for Fencing and [REBALANCE] Fast Lifting Simulator is charted above.

Fencing
3
playing now
490 24h peak · 33.6M visits
VS
[REBALANCE] Fast 💪 Lifting Simulator
478
playing now
496 24h peak · 2.1M visits

Player count history

Fencing[REBALANCE] Fast Lifting Simulator

Head to head

Metric Fencing [REBALANCE] Fast Lifting SimulatorDifference
Playing now3478475 (159.3×)
24h peak4904966
24h average82306224 (3.7×)
7-day peak4904966
7-day average20279259 (13.9×)
30-day peak4904966
All-time peak490700210
24h change >999% 33.6%
7d change >999% 11.4%
Total visits33.6M2.1M31.5M (15.8×)
Visits (24h)3K19.6K16.6K (6.5×)
Visits (7d)6.8K147.4K140.6K (21.7×)
Favorites119.3K5.1K114.2K (23.4×)
Rating75.0%83.5%
Global rank (players)#5,639#2,165of 8,283
Trending score270.622.2
CreatedJun 22, 2009Apr 22, 2026
GenreActionSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Fencing, 13 for [REBALANCE] Fast Lifting Simulator.