Fencing vs [ QOL] Soccer: Zero

[ QOL] Soccer: Zero currently leads with 409 concurrent players against 1, a 409.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [ QOL] Soccer: Zero at 1,272 concurrent players, versus 490. Momentum favours Fencing: +900.0% week over week versus +51.5% for [ QOL] Soccer: Zero. Lifetime, Fencing has more visits (33.6M vs 30M). Full side-by-side history for Fencing and [ QOL] Soccer: Zero is charted above.

Fencing
1
playing now
490 24h peak · 33.6M visits
VS
[⭐ QOL] Soccer: Zero
409
playing now
565 24h peak · 30M visits

Player count history

Fencing[ QOL] Soccer: Zero

Head to head

Metric Fencing [ QOL] Soccer: ZeroDifference
Playing now1409408 (409.0×)
24h peak49056575
24h average38409371 (10.8×)
7-day peak4901,192702 (2.4×)
7-day average10453443 (45.3×)
30-day peak4901,192702 (2.4×)
All-time peak4901,272782 (2.6×)
24h change >999% 18.5%
7d change 900.0% 51.5%
Total visits33.6M30M3.6M
Visits (24h)3.1K49.2K46.1K (15.9×)
Visits (7d)6.8K383.2K376.4K (56.1×)
Favorites119.3K99.7K19.7K
Rating75.0%95.0%
Global rank (players)#5,702#2,138of 8,283
Trending score134.5-24.1
CreatedJun 22, 2009Apr 30, 2026
GenreActionSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Fencing, 10 for [ QOL] Soccer: Zero.