Fencing vs [UPD] SharkBite Classic
[UPD] SharkBite Classic currently leads with 858 concurrent players against 0, a 858.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] SharkBite Classic at 1,460 concurrent players, versus 490. Momentum favours Fencing: +1000.0% week over week versus -11.8% for [UPD] SharkBite Classic. Lifetime, [UPD] SharkBite Classic has more visits (1.7B vs 33.6M). Full side-by-side history for Fencing and [UPD] SharkBite Classic is charted above.
Fencing
0
playing now
490 24h peak · 33.6M visits
VS
[UPD🥳] SharkBite Classic 🦈
858
playing now
1,146 24h peak · 1.7B visits
Player count history
Fencing[UPD] SharkBite Classic
Head to head
| Metric | Fencing | [UPD] SharkBite Classic | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 0 | 858 | 858 |
| 24h peak | 490 | 1,146 | 656 (2.3×) |
| 24h average | 44 | 822 | 778 (18.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 490 | 1,148 | 658 (2.3×) |
| 7-day average | 11 | 742 | 731 (67.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 490 | 1,214 | 724 (2.5×) |
| All-time peak | 490 | 1,460 | 970 (3.0×) |
| 24h change | ▲ >999% | ▲ 12.0% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ >999% | ▼ 11.8% | — |
| Total visits | 33.6M | 1.7B | 1.6B (49.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 3K | 92.4K | 89.4K (31.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 6.7K | 631.4K | 624.7K (94.0×) |
| Favorites | 119.3K | 5.1M | 5M (42.9×) |
| Rating | 75.0% | 89.6% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #5,786 | #1,392 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | 158.8 | 30.5 | — |
| Created | Jun 22, 2009 | Apr 10, 2017 | — |
| Genre | Action | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Fencing, 14 for [UPD] SharkBite Classic.