Fencing vs CQB Hell

CQB Hell currently leads with 745 concurrent players against 0, a 745.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to CQB Hell at 1,196 concurrent players, versus 490. Momentum favours Fencing: +1000.0% week over week versus +35.2% for CQB Hell. Lifetime, Fencing has more visits (33.6M vs 12.2M). Full side-by-side history for Fencing and CQB Hell is charted above.

Fencing
0
playing now
490 24h peak · 33.6M visits
VS
CQB Hell
745
playing now
1,061 24h peak · 12.2M visits

Player count history

FencingCQB Hell

Head to head

Metric Fencing CQB HellDifference
Playing now0745745
24h peak4901,061571 (2.2×)
24h average44834790 (19.0×)
7-day peak4901,188698 (2.4×)
7-day average11757746 (68.8×)
30-day peak4901,188698 (2.4×)
All-time peak4901,196706 (2.4×)
24h change >999% 1.0%
7d change >999% 35.2%
Total visits33.6M12.2M21.4M (2.7×)
Visits (24h)3K107.4K104.4K (36.0×)
Visits (7d)6.7K710.9K704.2K (105.8×)
Favorites119.3K55.4K63.9K (2.2×)
Rating75.0%71.6%
Global rank (players)#5,802#1,545of 8,339
Trending score158.828.8
CreatedJun 22, 2009Mar 14, 2025
GenreActionShooter

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Fencing, 10 for CQB Hell.