Horse World vs Build to Survive
Build to Survive currently leads with 6,557 concurrent players against 949, a 6.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 6,783 concurrent players, versus 1,010. Lifetime, Horse World has more visits (644.7M vs 405.9M). Full side-by-side history for Horse World and Build to Survive is charted above.
Horse World
949
playing now
1,010 24h peak · 644.7M visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️
6,557
playing now
6,783 24h peak · 405.9M visits
Player count history
Horse WorldBuild to Survive
Head to head
| Metric | Horse World | Build to Survive | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 949 | 6,557 | 5,608 (6.9×) |
| 24h peak | 1,010 | 6,783 | 5,773 (6.7×) |
| 24h average | 775 | 5,846 | 5,071 (7.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,010 | 6,783 | 5,773 (6.7×) |
| 7-day average | 727 | 5,347 | 4,620 (7.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,010 | 6,783 | 5,773 (6.7×) |
| All-time peak | 1,010 | 6,783 | 5,773 (6.7×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 12.3% | ▲ 11.5% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 644.7M | 405.9M | 238.8M (1.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 69.9K | 534.7K | 464.9K (7.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 173.2K | 2.1M | 2M (12.4×) |
| Favorites | 1.4M | 10.9M | 9.4M (7.6×) |
| Rating | 88.9% | 96.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,540 | #310 | of 5,275 |
| Trending score | 18.5 | 35.0 | — |
| Created | Nov 18, 2017 | Feb 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Roleplay & Avatar Sim | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for Horse World, 5 for Build to Survive.