Horse World vs Eat the World

Eat the World currently leads with 3,609 concurrent players against 1,002, a 3.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 1,010. Lifetime, Horse World has more visits (644.7M vs 615.8M). Full side-by-side history for Horse World and Eat the World is charted above.

Horse World
1,002
playing now
1,010 24h peak · 644.7M visits
VS
Eat the World
3,609
playing now
4,969 24h peak · 615.8M visits

Player count history

Horse WorldEat the World

Head to head

Metric Horse World Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now1,0023,6092,607 (3.6×)
24h peak1,0104,9693,959 (4.9×)
24h average7653,8773,112 (5.1×)
7-day peak1,0105,2404,230 (5.2×)
7-day average7543,8373,083 (5.1×)
30-day peak1,0105,2404,230 (5.2×)
All-time peak1,0105,2614,251 (5.2×)
24h change 4.7% 5.3%
7d change
Total visits644.7M615.8M28.9M
Visits (24h)68.4K393.6K325.2K (5.8×)
Visits (7d)117.5K1.7M1.6M (14.4×)
Favorites1.4M27.8M26.4M (19.4×)
Rating88.9%94.7%
Global rank (players)#1,391#529of 4,743
Trending score4.13.7
CreatedNov 18, 2017Feb 22, 2024
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 2 days for Horse World, 5 for Eat the World.

Horse World vs Eat the World — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals