FNAF: Eternal Nights vs [UPD] Basketball Legends

[UPD] Basketball Legends currently leads with 7,679 concurrent players against 5,600. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Basketball Legends at 8,518 concurrent players, versus 5,983. Lifetime, [UPD] Basketball Legends has more visits (749.5M vs 313.2M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Eternal Nights and [UPD] Basketball Legends is charted above.

FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
5,600
playing now
5,777 24h peak · 313.2M visits
VS
[UPD] 🏀Basketball Legends🏀
7,679
playing now
8,518 24h peak · 749.5M visits

Player count history

FNAF: Eternal Nights[UPD] Basketball Legends

Head to head

Metric FNAF: Eternal Nights [UPD] Basketball LegendsDifference
Playing now5,6007,6792,079
24h peak5,7778,5182,741
24h average4,4905,5471,057
7-day peak5,9838,5182,535
7-day average4,3744,901527
30-day peak5,9838,5182,535
All-time peak5,9838,5182,535
24h change 32.3% 25.5%
7d change
Total visits313.2M749.5M436.3M (2.4×)
Visits (24h)525K407.4K117.6K
Visits (7d)1.8M1.3M543.4K
Favorites837K671.3K165.6K
Rating94.4%86.1%
Global rank (players)#296#205of 4,381
Trending score9.649.1
CreatedOct 27, 2022Jul 31, 2023
GenreSurvivalSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for FNAF: Eternal Nights, 5 for [UPD] Basketball Legends.

FNAF: Eternal Nights vs [UPD] Basketball Legends — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals