FNAF: Eternal Nights vs The Classic Soccer
The Classic Soccer currently leads with 6,202 concurrent players against 5,347. On all-time peak the record belongs to The Classic Soccer at 6,586 concurrent players, versus 5,983. Lifetime, FNAF: Eternal Nights has more visits (313.2M vs 99.1M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Eternal Nights and The Classic Soccer is charted above.
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
5,347
playing now
5,777 24h peak · 313.2M visits
VS
The Classic Soccer
6,202
playing now
6,293 24h peak · 99.1M visits
Player count history
FNAF: Eternal NightsThe Classic Soccer
Head to head
| Metric | FNAF: Eternal Nights | The Classic Soccer | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 5,347 | 6,202 | 855 |
| 24h peak | 5,777 | 6,293 | 516 |
| 24h average | 4,537 | 3,675 | 862 |
| 7-day peak | 5,983 | 6,586 | 603 |
| 7-day average | 4,380 | 3,448 | 932 |
| 30-day peak | 5,983 | 6,586 | 603 |
| All-time peak | 5,983 | 6,586 | 603 |
| 24h change | ▲ 28.2% | ▲ 58.4% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 313.2M | 99.1M | 214.1M (3.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 511.7K | 223.3K | 288.4K (2.3×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.8M | 844.7K | 950.8K (2.1×) |
| Favorites | 836.9K | 33.3K | 803.5K (25.1×) |
| Rating | 94.4% | 84.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #284 | #240 | of 4,278 |
| Trending score | 13.0 | 23.3 | — |
| Created | Oct 27, 2022 | Jun 5, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for FNAF: Eternal Nights, 4 for The Classic Soccer.