FNAF: Eternal Nights vs Basketball: Zero

Basketball: Zero currently leads with 8,569 concurrent players against 5,744. On all-time peak the record belongs to Basketball: Zero at 8,569 concurrent players, versus 5,983. Lifetime, Basketball: Zero has more visits (1.1B vs 313.3M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Eternal Nights and Basketball: Zero is charted above.

FNAF: Eternal Nights πŸ•
5,744
playing now
5,832 24h peak Β· 313.3M visits
VS
Basketball: Zero
8,569
playing now
8,569 24h peak Β· 1.1B visits

Player count history

FNAF: Eternal NightsBasketball: Zero

Head to head

Metric FNAF: Eternal Nights Basketball: ZeroDifference
Playing now5,7448,5692,825
24h peak5,8328,5692,737
24h average4,6647,5282,864 (1.6Γ—)
7-day peak5,9838,5692,586
7-day average4,4066,4882,082
30-day peak5,9838,5692,586
All-time peak5,9838,5692,586
24h changeβ–² 48.3%β–² 32.8%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits313.3M1.1B796.9M (3.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)539.3K635.7K96.4K
Visits (7d)1.9M2.1M192.9K
Favorites837.1K2.2M1.3M (2.6Γ—)
Rating94.4%98.3%β€”
Global rank (players)#288#190of 4,381
Trending score21.461.9β€”
CreatedOct 27, 2022Jan 3, 2025β€”
GenreSurvivalSports & Racingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for FNAF: Eternal Nights, 5 for Basketball: Zero.

FNAF: Eternal Nights vs Basketball: Zero β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals