FNAF: Eternal Nights vs [UPD] Soccer Stars 26

[UPD] Soccer Stars 26 currently leads with 3,198 concurrent players against 2,297. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 7,002 concurrent players, versus 6,329. Momentum favours [UPD] Soccer Stars 26: +75.7% week over week versus -10.7% for FNAF: Eternal Nights. Lifetime, FNAF: Eternal Nights has more visits (316.8M vs 36.9M). Full side-by-side history for FNAF: Eternal Nights and [UPD] Soccer Stars 26 is charted above.

FNAF: Eternal Nights πŸ•
2,297
playing now
5,075 24h peak Β· 316.8M visits
VS
[UPD] Soccer Stars 26
3,198
playing now
6,329 24h peak Β· 36.9M visits

Player count history

FNAF: Eternal Nights[UPD] Soccer Stars 26

Head to head

Metric FNAF: Eternal Nights [UPD] Soccer Stars 26Difference
Playing now2,2973,198901
24h peak5,0756,3291,254
24h average3,1234,2311,108
7-day peak6,8856,329556
7-day average3,8723,663209
30-day peak6,8856,329556
All-time peak7,0026,329673
24h changeβ–Ό 14.8%β–Ό 10.9%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 10.7%β–² 75.7%β€”
Total visits316.8M36.9M279.9M (8.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)497K1M543K (2.1Γ—)
Visits (7d)4M5.7M1.8M
Favorites846K727K119K
Rating94.4%80.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#536#397of 7,213
Trending score-67.255.9β€”
CreatedOct 27, 2022Jun 1, 2026β€”
GenreSurvivalSports & Racingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for FNAF: Eternal Nights, 11 for [UPD] Soccer Stars 26.

FNAF: Eternal Nights vs [UPD] Soccer Stars 26 β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals