Zoo Tycoon vs BOOMSTICK Football
Zoo Tycoon currently leads with 1,086 concurrent players against 556, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Zoo Tycoon at 2,751 concurrent players, versus 808. Momentum favours BOOMSTICK Football: +48.5% week over week versus +33.3% for Zoo Tycoon. Lifetime, Zoo Tycoon has more visits (122.5M vs 21.4M). Full side-by-side history for Zoo Tycoon and BOOMSTICK Football is charted above.
Zoo Tycoon 🐣
1,086
playing now
2,751 24h peak · 122.5M visits
VS
BOOMSTICK Football 🏈
556
playing now
731 24h peak · 21.4M visits
Player count history
Zoo TycoonBOOMSTICK Football
Head to head
| Metric | Zoo Tycoon | BOOMSTICK Football | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,086 | 556 | 530 (2.0×) |
| 24h peak | 2,751 | 731 | 2,020 (3.8×) |
| 24h average | 1,701 | 425 | 1,276 (4.0×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,751 | 783 | 1,968 (3.5×) |
| 7-day average | 1,444 | 303 | 1,141 (4.8×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,751 | 783 | 1,968 (3.5×) |
| All-time peak | 2,751 | 808 | 1,943 (3.4×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 4.3% | ▲ 37.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 33.3% | ▲ 48.5% | — |
| Total visits | 122.5M | 21.4M | 101M (5.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 168.3K | 44.4K | 123.9K (3.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 931.7K | 346.3K | 585.5K (2.7×) |
| Favorites | 403.8K | 230.1K | 173.6K (1.8×) |
| Rating | 84.0% | 81.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,229 | #1,855 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 56.6 | 98.1 | — |
| Created | Oct 24, 2017 | Oct 30, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Zoo Tycoon, 11 for BOOMSTICK Football.