Zoo Tycoon vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 2,624 concurrent players against 2,510. On all-time peak the record belongs to Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] at 2,854 concurrent players, versus 2,751. Momentum favours Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]: +191.6% week over week versus +40.2% for Zoo Tycoon. Lifetime, Zoo Tycoon has more visits (122.4M vs 4.4M). Full side-by-side history for Zoo Tycoon and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.
Zoo Tycoon π£
2,510
playing now
2,751 24h peak Β· 122.4M visits
VS
[π] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
2,624
playing now
2,684 24h peak Β· 4.4M visits
Player count history
Zoo TycoonTotal Conquest WW2 [Beta]
Head to head
| Metric | Zoo Tycoon | Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,510 | 2,624 | 114 |
| 24h peak | 2,751 | 2,684 | 67 |
| 24h average | 2,104 | 2,320 | 216 |
| 7-day peak | 2,751 | 2,734 | 17 |
| 7-day average | 1,521 | 1,913 | 392 |
| 30-day peak | 2,751 | 2,734 | 17 |
| All-time peak | 2,751 | 2,854 | 103 |
| 24h change | β² 28.9% | β² 2.1% | β |
| 7d change | β² 40.2% | β² 191.6% | β |
| Total visits | 122.4M | 4.4M | 118M (27.8Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 157.5K | 421.5K | 264K (2.7Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 912.7K | 2.9M | 2M (3.2Γ) |
| Favorites | 403.7K | 28.1K | 375.6K (14.4Γ) |
| Rating | 84.0% | 92.2% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #835 | #812 | of 8,195 |
| Trending score | 125.4 | 70.7 | β |
| Created | Oct 24, 2017 | Jul 29, 2026 | β |
| Genre | Simulation | Strategy | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 13 days for Zoo Tycoon, 12 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].