Zoo Tycoon vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 6,165 concurrent players against 1,037, a 5.9Γ advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 6,365 concurrent players, versus 1,784. Lifetime, FNAF: Eternal Nights has more visits (313.7M vs 121.4M). Full side-by-side history for Zoo Tycoon and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
Zoo Tycoon π£
1,037
playing now
1,784 24h peak Β· 121.4M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights π
6,165
playing now
6,365 24h peak Β· 313.7M visits
Player count history
Zoo TycoonFNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | Zoo Tycoon | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,037 | 6,165 | 5,128 (5.9Γ) |
| 24h peak | 1,784 | 6,365 | 4,581 (3.6Γ) |
| 24h average | 1,225 | 5,012 | 3,787 (4.1Γ) |
| 7-day peak | 1,784 | 6,365 | 4,581 (3.6Γ) |
| 7-day average | 1,075 | 4,396 | 3,321 (4.1Γ) |
| 30-day peak | 1,784 | 6,365 | 4,581 (3.6Γ) |
| All-time peak | 1,784 | 6,365 | 4,581 (3.6Γ) |
| 24h change | β² 10.2% | β² 25.3% | β |
| 7d change | β | β | β |
| Total visits | 121.4M | 313.7M | 192.3M (2.6Γ) |
| Visits (24h) | 118K | 586.7K | 468.8K (5.0Γ) |
| Visits (7d) | 448.3K | 2.3M | 1.9M (5.2Γ) |
| Favorites | 401.9K | 838.3K | 436.4K (2.1Γ) |
| Rating | 84.0% | 94.4% | β |
| Global rank (players) | #1,334 | #276 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | 42.2 | 51.6 | β |
| Created | Oct 24, 2017 | Oct 27, 2022 | β |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | β |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β 5 days for Zoo Tycoon, 5 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.