Touch Soccer vs +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
Touch Soccer currently leads with 1,159 concurrent players against 366, a 3.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! at 4,967 concurrent players, versus 1,592. Momentum favours Touch Soccer: -15.2% week over week versus -71.6% for +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!. Lifetime, Touch Soccer has more visits (164.1M vs 6.6M). Full side-by-side history for Touch Soccer and +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! is charted above.
Touch Soccer
1,159
playing now
1,254 24h peak · 164.1M visits
VS
+1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
366
playing now
620 24h peak · 6.6M visits
Player count history
Touch Soccer+1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!
Head to head
| Metric | Touch Soccer | +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,159 | 366 | 793 (3.2×) |
| 24h peak | 1,254 | 620 | 634 (2.0×) |
| 24h average | 1,020 | 438 | 582 (2.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,362 | 1,532 | 170 |
| 7-day average | 967 | 652 | 315 |
| 30-day peak | 1,510 | 3,759 | 2,249 (2.5×) |
| All-time peak | 1,592 | 4,967 | 3,375 (3.1×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 6.9% | ▲ 68.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 15.2% | ▼ 71.6% | — |
| Total visits | 164.1M | 6.6M | 157.5M (24.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 150.2K | 57.4K | 92.8K (2.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.1M | 599.7K | 518.1K (1.9×) |
| Favorites | 89.7K | 534.9K | 445.2K (6.0×) |
| Rating | 74.7% | 89.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,314 | #2,376 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 16.1 | -83.8 | — |
| Created | Oct 10, 2022 | May 23, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Sports & Racing | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Touch Soccer, 11 for +1 Jump Beanstalk for Viral Squishy!.