Touch Soccer vs FNAF: Co-op
FNAF: Co-op currently leads with 3,087 concurrent players against 1,056, a 2.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Co-op at 3,912 concurrent players, versus 1,592. Momentum favours FNAF: Co-op: -7.4% week over week versus -15.4% for Touch Soccer. Lifetime, FNAF: Co-op has more visits (384.2M vs 164.1M). Full side-by-side history for Touch Soccer and FNAF: Co-op is charted above.
Touch Soccer
1,056
playing now
1,254 24h peak · 164.1M visits
VS
FNAF: Co-op
3,087
playing now
3,627 24h peak · 384.2M visits
Player count history
Touch SoccerFNAF: Co-op
Head to head
| Metric | Touch Soccer | FNAF: Co-op | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,056 | 3,087 | 2,031 (2.9×) |
| 24h peak | 1,254 | 3,627 | 2,373 (2.9×) |
| 24h average | 1,009 | 2,786 | 1,777 (2.8×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,362 | 3,627 | 2,265 (2.7×) |
| 7-day average | 965 | 2,331 | 1,366 (2.4×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,510 | 3,627 | 2,117 (2.4×) |
| All-time peak | 1,592 | 3,912 | 2,320 (2.5×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 7.0% | ▲ 16.2% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 15.4% | ▼ 7.4% | — |
| Total visits | 164.1M | 384.2M | 220.1M (2.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 146.7K | 225.6K | 78.9K (1.5×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.1M | 1.6M | 470.8K |
| Favorites | 89.7K | 4.2M | 4.1M (46.8×) |
| Rating | 74.7% | 94.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,342 | #531 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 13.4 | 66.6 | — |
| Created | Oct 10, 2022 | Feb 15, 2023 | — |
| Genre | Sports & Racing | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Touch Soccer, 13 for FNAF: Co-op.