Touch Soccer vs TimeBomb AnkleBreak!
TimeBomb AnkleBreak! currently leads with 2,431 concurrent players against 1,041, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to TimeBomb AnkleBreak! at 3,178 concurrent players, versus 1,592. Momentum favours TimeBomb AnkleBreak!: +13.0% week over week versus -15.2% for Touch Soccer. Lifetime, Touch Soccer has more visits (164.1M vs 71M). Full side-by-side history for Touch Soccer and TimeBomb AnkleBreak! is charted above.
Touch Soccer
1,041
playing now
1,254 24h peak · 164.1M visits
VS
TimeBomb AnkleBreak!
2,431
playing now
2,954 24h peak · 71M visits
Player count history
Touch SoccerTimeBomb AnkleBreak!
Head to head
| Metric | Touch Soccer | TimeBomb AnkleBreak! | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,041 | 2,431 | 1,390 (2.3×) |
| 24h peak | 1,254 | 2,954 | 1,700 (2.4×) |
| 24h average | 1,017 | 2,478 | 1,461 (2.4×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,362 | 2,954 | 1,592 (2.2×) |
| 7-day average | 967 | 2,191 | 1,224 (2.3×) |
| 30-day peak | 1,510 | 2,954 | 1,444 (2.0×) |
| All-time peak | 1,592 | 3,178 | 1,586 (2.0×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 6.6% | ▲ 9.6% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 15.2% | ▲ 13.0% | — |
| Total visits | 164.1M | 71M | 93.1M (2.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 153.2K | 427.7K | 274.5K (2.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.1M | 2.8M | 1.7M (2.5×) |
| Favorites | 89.7K | 101.1K | 11.4K |
| Rating | 74.7% | 82.9% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,336 | #694 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 15.2 | 44.0 | — |
| Created | Oct 10, 2022 | Feb 19, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Sports & Racing | Party & Casual | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Touch Soccer, 13 for TimeBomb AnkleBreak!.