[100HP] STRAFE FPS vs Suburban Weather Simulator

Suburban Weather Simulator currently leads with 493 concurrent players against 307, a 1.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Suburban Weather Simulator at 806 concurrent players, versus 754. Momentum favours [100HP] STRAFE FPS: -5.0% week over week versus -26.1% for Suburban Weather Simulator. Lifetime, Suburban Weather Simulator has more visits (13.5M vs 3.8M). Full side-by-side history for [100HP] STRAFE FPS and Suburban Weather Simulator is charted above.

[100HPπŸ”₯] STRAFE FPS
307
playing now
483 24h peak Β· 3.8M visits
VS
Suburban Weather Simulator
493
playing now
567 24h peak Β· 13.5M visits

Player count history

[100HP] STRAFE FPSSuburban Weather Simulator

Head to head

Metric [100HP] STRAFE FPS Suburban Weather SimulatorDifference
Playing now307493186 (1.6Γ—)
24h peak48356784
24h average32441187
7-day peak74271626
7-day average34540257
30-day peak74280664
All-time peak75480652
24h changeβ–Ό 0.6%β–² 17.8%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 5.0%β–Ό 26.1%β€”
Total visits3.8M13.5M9.7M (3.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)45.2K53.3K8.1K
Visits (7d)341.7K407.1K65.4K
Favorites80.5K41.4K39.1K (1.9Γ—)
Rating88.0%78.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#2,392#1,839of 7,215
Trending score-14.35.5β€”
CreatedNov 17, 2025Jun 17, 2025β€”
GenreShooterSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 9 days for [100HP] STRAFE FPS, 11 for Suburban Weather Simulator.

[100HP] STRAFE FPS vs Suburban Weather Simulator β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals