[HELI] Fallen Survival vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

[HELI] Fallen Survival currently leads with 1,828 concurrent players against 740, a 2.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [HELI] Fallen Survival at 3,523 concurrent players, versus 1,769. Momentum favours [HELI] Fallen Survival: +5.0% week over week versus -16.5% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, [HELI] Fallen Survival has more visits (46.5M vs 7.4M). Full side-by-side history for [HELI] Fallen Survival and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

[🚁HELI] Fallen Survival🏹
1,828
playing now
2,203 24h peak · 46.5M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
740
playing now
1,769 24h peak · 7.4M visits

Player count history

[HELI] Fallen SurvivalFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric [HELI] Fallen Survival FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now1,8287401,088 (2.5×)
24h peak2,2031,769434
24h average1,7981,245553
7-day peak3,1071,7691,338 (1.8×)
7-day average1,3961,069327
30-day peak3,1071,7691,338 (1.8×)
All-time peak3,5231,7691,754 (2.0×)
24h change 1.4% 5.9%
7d change 5.0% 16.5%
Total visits46.5M7.4M39.1M (6.3×)
Visits (24h)48.5K202.7K154.2K (4.2×)
Visits (7d)329.8K1.1M808K (3.4×)
Favorites276.5K802K525.5K (2.9×)
Rating85.1%81.7%
Global rank (players)#872#1,606of 8,283
Trending score92.249.9
CreatedJul 15, 2022Apr 24, 2026
GenreActionSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [HELI] Fallen Survival, 10 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.