Scary Baboon (beta) vs Roll to Defend
Scary Baboon (beta) currently leads with 701 concurrent players against 384, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Roll to Defend at 1,563 concurrent players, versus 1,106. Momentum favours Scary Baboon (beta): +24.8% week over week versus -47.1% for Roll to Defend. Lifetime, Roll to Defend has more visits (13.8M vs 1.5M). Full side-by-side history for Scary Baboon (beta) and Roll to Defend is charted above.
Scary Baboon (beta)
701
playing now
900 24h peak · 1.5M visits
VS
Roll to Defend
384
playing now
550 24h peak · 13.8M visits
Player count history
Scary Baboon (beta)Roll to Defend
Head to head
| Metric | Scary Baboon (beta) | Roll to Defend | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 701 | 384 | 317 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 900 | 550 | 350 (1.6×) |
| 24h average | 691 | 437 | 254 (1.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,079 | 1,078 | 1 |
| 7-day average | 750 | 639 | 111 |
| 30-day peak | 1,079 | 1,563 | 484 |
| All-time peak | 1,106 | 1,563 | 457 |
| 24h change | ▲ 2.7% | ▼ 13.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 24.8% | ▼ 47.1% | — |
| Total visits | 1.5M | 13.8M | 12.4M (9.4×) |
| Visits (24h) | 113.6K | 34.1K | 79.5K (3.3×) |
| Visits (7d) | 967.8K | 373.8K | 594.1K (2.6×) |
| Favorites | 2.4K | 29.3K | 26.9K (12.0×) |
| Rating | 93.1% | 95.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,461 | #2,009 | of 7,213 |
| Trending score | -21.7 | -80.6 | — |
| Created | Jul 22, 2026 | May 14, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 9 days for Scary Baboon (beta), 11 for Roll to Defend.