nico's nextbots vs FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB currently leads with 1,056 concurrent players against 529, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB at 1,769 concurrent players, versus 987. Momentum favours nico's nextbots: -6.3% week over week versus -16.4% for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB. Lifetime, nico's nextbots has more visits (627.8M vs 7.4M). Full side-by-side history for nico's nextbots and FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB is charted above.

nico's nextbots 🌸
529
playing now
987 24h peak · 627.8M visits
VS
😡 FAST WAVE 😡 X99999999 ETFB
1,056
playing now
1,769 24h peak · 7.4M visits

Player count history

nico's nextbotsFAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB

Head to head

Metric nico's nextbots FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFBDifference
Playing now5291,056527 (2.0×)
24h peak9871,769782 (1.8×)
24h average6641,281617 (1.9×)
7-day peak9871,769782 (1.8×)
7-day average6151,083468 (1.8×)
30-day peak9871,769782 (1.8×)
All-time peak9871,769782 (1.8×)
24h change 1.8% 8.0%
7d change 6.3% 16.4%
Total visits627.8M7.4M620.4M (85.0×)
Visits (24h)108.5K198.3K89.8K (1.8×)
Visits (7d)688.6K1.1M443.7K (1.6×)
Favorites2.2M800.6K1.4M (2.8×)
Rating92.0%81.7%
Global rank (players)#2,160#1,481of 8,283
Trending score21.755.6
CreatedJul 4, 2022Apr 24, 2026
GenreSurvivalSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for nico's nextbots, 10 for FAST WAVE X99999999 ETFB.